6 Comments
User's avatar
Jennifer Dell-Ernstrom's avatar

I really enjoyed the episode (I listened on Spotify). I found it really helpful his solutions framework (physics, chemistry, biology). The interview didn't touch on population growth, but I guess this would be under the biology rubric. Any thoughts regarding this issue?

Expand full comment
Nick Anxgrs's avatar

Heavily researched does not guarantee correct. Even one erroneous assumption in common renders pages of references, papers and citations useless. CAGWโ€™s GHE contains three such assumptions.

GHE claims without it Earth becomes 33 C cooler, a 255 K, -18 C, ball of ice.

Wrong.

Naked Earth would be much like the Moon, barren, 400 K lit side, 100 K dark.

TFK_bams09 heat balance graphic uses the same 63 twice violating GAAP and calculating out of thin air a 396 BB/333 โ€œbackโ€/63 net GHE radiative forcing loop violating LoT 1 & 2.

Wrong.

Likewise, the ubiquitous plethora of clones.

GHE requires Earth to radiate โ€œextraโ€ energy as a BB.

Wrong.

A BB requires all energy leaving the system to do so by radiation. Per TFK_bams09 60% leaves by kinetic modes, i.e. conduction, convection, advection and latent rendering BB impossible.

GHE is bogus and CAGW a scam so alarmists must resort to fear mongering, lies, lawsuits, censorship and violence.

Expand full comment
Alec Patton's avatar

Iโ€™m not seeing this on the podcast-is it coming or is it a different thing?

Expand full comment
Ayana Elizabeth Johnson's avatar

Oh nuts. Where are you trying to listen? Looks like it's working here in Substack and on Spotify, but isn't syncing on Apple yet for some reason.

Expand full comment
Alec Patton's avatar

Looking on apple. No worries, Iโ€™ll keep an eye out. I love the show (and book)!

Expand full comment
Ayana Elizabeth Johnson's avatar

Itโ€™s live on Apple now :)

Expand full comment